Sunday, April 16, 2006
I think we're thinking of the same story, althought the protagonist's country of origin isn't really important. I guess that what's important here is that niether side has been able to provide proof beyond speculation
There you go, again...
Beyond speculation? We must be talking about two different stories. I was speaking about a Canandian climber who inserted footage of a Danish climber and claimed it was himself summiting Everest. There wasn't anything speculative about it - maybe miraculous coincidence? The pictures proved it. I used to have a split screen of it somewhere. I think the Canadian climber threatened a frivolous lawsuit and the website dropped the story. Probably because they didn't want to spend their time, efforts, and money fighting it.
Maybe you could tell me how it was all speculative. If someone tried to make me put in fake footage of a summit, I would refuse to do it. I don't care if the person actually did summit.
There you go, again...
Beyond speculation? We must be talking about two different stories. I was speaking about a Canandian climber who inserted footage of a Danish climber and claimed it was himself summiting Everest. There wasn't anything speculative about it - maybe miraculous coincidence? The pictures proved it. I used to have a split screen of it somewhere. I think the Canadian climber threatened a frivolous lawsuit and the website dropped the story. Probably because they didn't want to spend their time, efforts, and money fighting it.
Maybe you could tell me how it was all speculative. If someone tried to make me put in fake footage of a summit, I would refuse to do it. I don't care if the person actually did summit.
