Sunday, April 16, 2006
Quite simply, if slanderous things are being posted, then those who “profit” from them are responsible for any damages, or at the very least have to pay to defend themselves against charges.
Meh! You put up a disclaimer. Spend much time on the Net? Think HBO, for example, is responsible for any idiot that spouts off on one of its forums? Come on.
Oh, I'm remembering now. No summit photo. How dare someone have the audacity to question his summit, especially when he'd gone ahead a inserted another climber (passed off as himself) into his motivational video.
The difference here is that the website wrote the article, they were responsible for its content, not forum posters.
Meh! You put up a disclaimer. Spend much time on the Net? Think HBO, for example, is responsible for any idiot that spouts off on one of its forums? Come on.
Oh, I'm remembering now. No summit photo. How dare someone have the audacity to question his summit, especially when he'd gone ahead a inserted another climber (passed off as himself) into his motivational video.
The difference here is that the website wrote the article, they were responsible for its content, not forum posters.
